Health & Research

Programs that change lives deserve systems that actually work.

ifarmwell put 700+ participants through a 5-module program under university ethics approval. We build the systems that deliver health programs, and measure whether they work.

An older couple walking a tree-lined path in morning light
Programs built around real participants
Scroll Built forifarmwellAdelaide UniversityFlinders UniversityActivated OSHC

Problems we see in health & research

The program is sound.
The systems behind it aren't.

  1. 01

    Outcomes you can't measure

    Programs delivered with no structured way to track participation, completion, or whether the intervention is actually working.

  2. 02

    Participant data in spreadsheets

    Sensitive records in shared files with no governance, no audit trail, and an ethics committee that will, rightly, have questions.

  3. 03

    Communications by hand

    Reminders, follow-ups, and module releases sent manually, so engagement depends on someone remembering to hit send.

  4. 04

    Insight trapped in reports

    Findings that could shape the next round of funding buried in PDFs instead of a living, queryable platform.

The work

Platforms that deliver
programs, and measure them.

Participant-facing systems with ethics-grade governance baked in from the first line of code.

A farmer working with livestock on-farm
Program deliveryifarmwell · UniSA
700+participants, ethics-approved

A 5-module mental-health intervention for farming communities. Conditional pathways, automated SMS and email, research-grade reporting across concurrent studies, built in partnership with the University of South Australia.

Suicide Prevention Australia accredited · Ethics-approved · Automated comms

Placeholder: research instrumentation
CapabilityEthics-ready by design

De-identified data, secure by default

Architecture documentation for your ethics committee, de-identified participant records, encrypted at rest, and audit trails, not retrofitted at the end, designed in from the start.

The Small Steps participant portal — a guided SMART goal-setting question with numbered progress steps
Program deliverySmall Steps WA

Participant portal with guided goal setting

A staged onboarding that walks participants through SMART goals for a 12-week program, with participant IDs, a resource library, and MoveMate, an in-product assistant for participants who need help.

Placeholder: research data
ReportingResearch-grade

From participation to publishable insight

Reporting designed around milestone dates and acquittal requirements, so the data your program generates is ready for funders, committees, and the next grant.

  • Adelaide University
  • Flinders University
  • ifarmwell
  • Veterinary Services Regulatory Board of South Australia
  • Activated OSHC

Why Redshift for health & research

Ethics-ready, and built
for the people in the program.

We understand research ethics

ifarmwell was built with the University of South Australia under ethics approval. We've designed for de-identified data, secure participant records, and the governance requirements of publicly funded health programs.

We build for real participants

700+ people working through a 5-module program isn't a demo screenshot. Accessibility, clear navigation, and minimal friction are defaults, because engagement is the whole point.

We work to your milestones

Grant-funded work has fixed reporting dates, acquittal requirements, and funder oversight. We scope and deliver around those constraints, not against them.

Your data stays onshore

Australian data centres, encrypted at rest, no offshore storage, no third-party access. For ethics-approved programs we provide architecture documentation for your committee.

700+Participants delivered through ifarmwell
5Modules with conditional pathways
EthicsApproved, university partnership
100%Australian-hosted participant data
“The online platform we worked with Harley to develop has now carried hundreds of participants, across multiple modules, without a hitch.”
Dr Kate Gunn · ifarmwell

Frequently asked

The questions health and
research teams usually ask us.

Do you understand research ethics and participant data requirements?

Yes. ifarmwell was built in partnership with the University of South Australia under ethics approval. We've designed systems for de-identified data, secure participant records, and the specific governance requirements of publicly funded health programs.

Can you work with grant-funded timelines and milestone reporting?

We've delivered projects with milestone-based accountability. We understand that grant-funded work has fixed reporting dates, acquittal requirements, and funder oversight. We scope and deliver around those constraints.

What if our team isn't technical?

Most of our health and research clients aren't. You describe the program and the participants. We translate that into the platform. You don't need to learn our language — we learn yours.

Can you build something that participants will actually use?

That's the entire point. ifarmwell has put 700+ participants through a 5-module mental health program. We design for real people in real situations — not for demo screenshots. Accessibility, clear navigation, and minimal friction are defaults, not add-ons.

Where is participant data stored?

In Australia. Australian data centres, encrypted at rest. No offshore storage. No third-party access. For ethics-approved programs, we provide architecture documentation for your ethics committee.

What does an engagement look like?

Discovery first, then a fixed-price quote — we price the outcome, not the hours, so you know the full cost before we start. Retainers for ongoing support are monthly and cancellable. For grant-funded programs, we scope around your milestone dates and acquittal requirements.

You're a small team. What happens to our program if Harley is unavailable mid-project?

Your program keeps running either way — participant delivery, automated communications, and backups run on standard cloud infrastructure and don't depend on anyone being at a keyboard. If Harley were out for more than a few days, the senior specialists we already work with step in and carry delivery, and because the code is documented and you own the code and the accounts, a new developer could take over without compromising the program or its audit trail. We build every project as if it might need to be handed over tomorrow — under ethics oversight, that's not optional.

Can we speak to your current health and research clients?

Yes. We're happy to connect you with people who can speak to the work directly. Just ask.

Adelaide-based

Have a program that
deserves a real platform?

Tell us about the program and the participants, and we'll tell you honestly whether we can help. Engagements typically start from $10k.

Talk to Harley about your program